Yes, it does take more time to research on your own rather than decide by what a small group of “experts” say.
Adwcleaner review pc magazine software#
I also learned that good software doesn’t need a great review by paid reviewers, but rather what individual users say. I was on a panel that reviewed/tested software and published reviews (Neat Net Tricks by Jack Teems) for many years and I can tell you first hand of the offers made to me privately to give good reviews no matter what I really thought (which I turned down – your word is your most valuable asset). I don’t consider such reviews as conclusive to make a decision by. No review by those pros you point out doesn’t mean the software is bad, it means that the pros didn’t even test it and only test the top name brands. Example: PC mag experts consider Norton one of the best out there…I and many others consider it Malware. IMO what individual users say about their experience with a product in making my decision about that product is more important than someone who may have “motivation” for a good review. It really doesn’t matter to me if my software is or isn’t recommended by websites that depend on the advertising for their business.
I would recommend it even thou it isn’t on those lists. My main anti-malware is Eset, which doesn’t appear on any of those lists but is highly praised by its users including me.
That link may explain what the malware is but I would never recommend an anti-malware product like Gridinsoft Anti-Malware that hasn’t featured in reliability tests by well-known and reputable testers.
0 kommentar(er)
